I've had me a tremendous last 12 months: We had to redo our hardwood floors 3x, all because an inadvertent nail in a baseboard happened to pierce a bathroom pipe the first time, and the repairs the second time weren't done right. My truck got hit twice, once at an on-ramp signal going to house church and the other while parked at a Starbucks, coming out of an Oasis meeting. Today, our house got broken into.
I write this not to invite sympathy (I realize these are mostly sufferings of the privileged, compared to the great injustices that exist in the world, but they still have a way of leaving one bruised and feeling vulnerable). I mostly write this to help me remember when all this was going on, to help me process. And how, in the end, I have to admit there is much to be thankful for despite the crumminess of it all. I'd much prefer that all this crap not have happened, but I am grateful for tender mercies nevertheless. Our floors did get fixed and redone - better than ever. My truck looks like new (at least the rear end does), though it's an old '96. And though there is some damage to the house and some rattled nerves, unbelievably nothing was taken and we were not harmed.
Unlike conventional evangelical theology which might suggest at this point that God is causing these things to teach us a lesson, I choose to believe that bad things happen partly because of our choices or the choices of others, but also sometimes because we live in a fallen world where evil and the accidental are a reality. That is not to say I have nothing to learn. Or that God isn't trying to teach me something. But I am saying this is not his method. I am saying that God does not cause bad things to happen so that I can learn something good. This would make God a horribly sadistic deity and I'd have to find some other line of work, because I ain't believing this nonsense and certainly not teaching it to others. Like any good parent, we don't have to cause bad things to happen to our children in order to teach them something good. Instead, we know that they will inevitably get hurt in the course of this life, and sometimes good can come of it as redemptive act - as something learned. A grace. Sometimes.
I don't believe the popular platitude that, "All things happen for a reason." I don't believe it because it's not true. It's nowhere to be found in Scripture. The plain truth is that many crummy and downright inexplicable things happen for absolutely no good reason. Yes, no good reason. So we don't have to feel pressed to turn bad things into good ones because we are convinced there is something God is trying to teach us - if we could only dry the tears long enough to see them. Instead, we can mourn the bad as bad, period. We can call the horrible horrible, the tragic tragic.
What Scripture does seem to reveal, however, is that the God of Jesus Christ assumes a fallen world in which people sin and are sinned against, and where both the beautiful and the terrible happen. The power of God is not to stop all bad things from happening, but that no bad thing can stop God's loving presence in our lives in the midst of bad things. The power of God is not to stop death, but to resurrect the dead.
No matter whose fault all this mess belongs to - you, me, the other guy, or the devil - God takes responsibility for it. First he weeps with us in solidarity with our pain. Then he offers us redemption. Sometimes in the form of healing and glimpses of mercy in this life. Sometimes only in the hope of resurrection in the next. Through it all, I can only confess and cling to the hope that nothing can separate us from the love of Christ - even when the reality of my circumstances seem to betray this truth. "Neither life nor death, nothing above or below, nor anything else in all creation" we are told. Apparently not even a warped floor, a dented bumper, or a broken window in a span of 12 months.
6 comments:
Wow, thank you for saying all that. I am so with you on that interpretation of rough experience. I think I needed to hear/read someone else say it though. =)
Thanks for leaving a comment Small World Wonder! I can relate, it's such a contrarian view in most places that you can feel all alone in the world - glad we can be kindred spirits on this one. May mean nothing to you, but I'm influenced greatly by Ray Anderson, former professor of theology at Fuller Seminary. Thanks again!
Hey Lori, thanks for the reply, hope you are doing well! I just finished a series on Hosea, and was completely struck by how many people couldn't get over that "God was for them." Their whole life experience led them to believe otherwise, and that is a worldview that is difficult to overcome except by the grace of God. It is a complete leap of faith to believe that the gospel starts not with "I'm a sinner/loser" but with "I am loved." But it makes all the difference. Here's to us framing all of life in his grace. Thanks for sharing!
"I am saying that God does not cause bad things to happen so that I can learn something good.
....
I don't believe the popular platitude that, "All things happen for a reason." I don't believe it because it's not true. It's nowhere to be found in Scripture."
How does this match up with the many interpretations of Romans 8:28 or Ecc. 3:1-8?
How's that fit with the Sovereignty of God? Even if he doesn't directly cause bad things to happen, but allows them to happen. He can still effect bad things to happen by not doing anything (or withholding protection).
"This would make God a horribly sadistic deity and I'd have to find some other line of work"
Aren't there many examples in the old testament where God strikes dead many people? What about the great flood & Noah? What about the trials of Job?
Seems part of your logic is that God needs to meet some sort of 'benevolent image', instead of accepting him for the way he is or isn't.
Tying your line of work to your beliefs could tend to create biases. Then your brain would try to force and mold the truth to match their beliefs, instead of seeing the truth for what it is.
"Like any good parent, we don't have to cause bad things to happen to our children in order to teach them something good."
This analogy gets used often, however would a parent of 2 billion people (Christians), or 7+ billion people, have the same type of perspective as a parent of just a few children? Also isn't it backwards to be comparing human traits to God, shouldn't it be the other way around?
Hi Eddie,
Thanks for your comments, I take it you disagree with me =) The questions you raise are valid ones. I’ve attempted to respond to them here:
You point out that I may be biased and may need to meet a “benevolent image” of God instead of accepting God the way he is or isn’t. I admit I have biases. I also think we all have our biases. None of us, no matter how careful, can come to Scripture unbiased. I wonder if you may be biased by your own need to fit your beliefs into some sort of “sovereignty of God” image?
In Romans 8:28, I don’t interpret that passage to say that all things are good, only that God can bring about good in all things. Not all things are good simply because God ultimately brings about good from them. We don’t have to make horrible things good. The passage gives hope that in all things good can emerge because God does this for those who love him. In my opinion, the sovereignty of God is not his power to manipulate all things so they have meaning, but that despite the presence of suffering and evil in this world, we can be assured that God will ultimately bring about his purposes for us. This is the hope Paul speaks of here. As for Ecclesiastes 3:1-8, this is a descriptive passage not a prescriptive one, which seems to reinforce my viewpoint that life is filled with both good and evil, wonderful and terrible. It does not say that God causes all these things nor that all things happen for a reason.
You are right, there are passages that suggest God strikes people dead. This is fair. In my interpretation, I have to ask myself, “ Is Jesus is the truest and fullest description of God or what other’s experience of him as written in the Old Testament?” In the end, we can conjecture about God’s intentions in passages of the OT that are admittedly troubling and disturbing. I am not suggesting that we dismiss them, only that they be held up against what we do know to be true about God: That Jesus is the concrete reality of God’s being, the beginning and end of understanding of who God is and what he is like. (John 1:18; John 1:7; Colossians 2:9). The question is, “Which do we believe to be truer about God? Jesus or what we see in passages of the OT?” Jesus reveals God’s heart to turn the other cheek, to not repay evil with evil, that love and healing are God’s intention for humanity. This is the tension. I admittedly give more weight to what is revealed in Christ.
You raise legitimate questions too regarding why God seems to “allow bad things to happen.” I present no good answers. This seems to be the point of Job. Job tells us of the reality of good and evil through use of literary device. And even when evil comes with full force, God still triumphs over evil. Interestingly, it is Job’s friends who have a need to explain and justify why bad things are happening to Job, but who in the end are judged. What’s fascinating (or frustrating) is that God offers no explanation for suffering and evil. Neither do Jesus or Paul. Both assume suffering and evil in the world. To claim that all things happen for a reason or to assume that all bad things have at its core a lesson from God is to make the mistake of Job’s friends. It occurs to me that a weakness of the sovereignty of God doctrine is that it can be an attempt to explain evil and suffering in a way that God himself refuses to offer. I do not know if God can stop all suffering or not; all I can say is that this is not his ultimate provision. In the end, God does not stop all suffering. He offers resurrection. The ultimate enemy is death as a consequence sin. This is to what God speaks and acts in human history. Death has been overcome through Jesus Christ.
As for analogies, I am not the first to compare human traits to God. Not since God became human in Jesus Christ! There are valid descriptions because God became human.
Again, thanks for writing. We probably have some differences, and that’s OK! Just wanted to elaborate on what is some of my underlying theology.
'In my interpretation, I have to ask myself, "Is Jesus is the truest and fullest description of God or what other's experience of him as written in the Old Testament?"'
How can one part of the bible be more true than another part? Wouldn't that go against the inerrancy of the bible doctrine? Jesus is the son of God, how can the son be the 'truest & fullest' description of the father?
The "Sovereignty of God" stance would seem to provide people comfort that God is in control, even if he chooses to allow evil to happen vs. the theory that the world is under satan's & randomness's control, where you're in danger at a whim of anything.
'I don’t interpret that passage to say that all things are good, only that God can bring about good in all things. ... The passage gives hope that in all things good can emerge because God does this for those who love him.'
This passage though often quoted, can seem quite inadequate to explain global tragedies or even personal tragic losses. How is a person supposed to see how God can bring about good, in the face of a loved one being killed from a act of nature or from a random act of violence?
'What’s fascinating (or frustrating) is that God offers no explanation for suffering and evil.'
There may be some wisdom in the fact that God offers no explanations, while everyone and many religious leaders always try to explain just how involved or not involved God is concerning bad things. But somehow he gets credit for all the good things. (It is easy to keep an image of a benevolent God with that assumption)
....
As a continuation of the parent/child analogy. Look at all the medical procedures that parents allow their babies to endure. There is a lot of controversy about vaccinations. Baby boys get circumsized for no real significant medical benefit. In the eyes of the baby, those painful experiences are 'BAD', yet the parent actively allows them to happen.
A parent also actively limits the freedom of a child/baby. Puts it in a crib, confines it to car seat, limits access to electrical outlets. The child just wants freedom and to explore, yet is often held back (restricted) by the parent.
A parent can even use physical restraint or punishment. If child doesn't listen when told not to run into the street, the parent must physical hold the child, or even cause emotional or physical pain to the child to protect the child from his/her own ignorance.
A parent who gives in to every one of their child's wishes ends up spoiling the child, which in the long term harms the child. However in the child's eye, getting what they want is 'Good', vs. not getting their wants is 'Bad'.
In this analogy, God is like the parent, we are like the child. Too ignorant to know what is really good or bad, and unable/incapable of seeing/understanding things from God's perspective.
Post a Comment